Good use of your k stuff, nice job highlighting it down—work on forcing your way through small errors in speech etc.—I think the second SFP card is probably repettivie, do a different argument, same at the very end of the speech—nice use of the impact d towards the end—good impact overview, don’t ever phrase it as an overview for the 1ar, but your arguments themselves are good—phrase things as “extend 2AC” blank once you move 2 the lbl—make sure you maintain the vocabulary of self fulfilling prophecy itself—some words you can cut off like “right now”
Practice Round 3--7/30 (Baxter)
Gracia—you may want an overview on the kritik in the 2ac, at the least make the transition to the first argument you are answering, you need to force it through the things—speakk in tags and don’t be internally repetitive—so basically they are saying, they are talking about, those are both things you don’t need to be saying here—you need to say more than that they said terror was real to answer the k, you need to disprove the aff—you can move through things with embedded clash etc.—say reject the arg not the team, how could they be condo?—you need a counterinterp, just like a t debate—good, spend 30 seconds on this and move on, everyone is devoting too much time to condo—you need a 2nr overview--
Disad Drills--7/28 (Baxter)
Good use of your k stuff, nice job highlighting it down—work on forcing your way through small errors in speech etc.—I think the second SFP card is probably repettivie, do a different argument, same at the very end of the speech—nice use of the impact d towards the end—good impact overview, don’t ever phrase it as an overview for the 1ar, but your arguments themselves are good—phrase things as “extend 2AC” blank once you move 2 the lbl—make sure you maintain the vocabulary of self fulfilling prophecy itself—some words you can cut off like “right now”
Practice Round 3--7/30 (Baxter)
Gracia—you may want an overview on the kritik in the 2ac, at the least make the transition to the first argument you are answering, you need to force it through the things—speakk in tags and don’t be internally repetitive—so basically they are saying, they are talking about, those are both things you don’t need to be saying here—you need to say more than that they said terror was real to answer the k, you need to disprove the aff—you can move through things with embedded clash etc.—say reject the arg not the team, how could they be condo?—you need a counterinterp, just like a t debate—good, spend 30 seconds on this and move on, everyone is devoting too much time to condo—you need a 2nr overview--